Saturday, February 21, 2015

Lenin's Theory of Peasant Differentiation: Definition, Classes, and Application

Lenin was a Russian sociologist. Lenin and his followers believed that, among the peasants, the division was strong. The farmers were facing the division process, and these divided farmers were taking part in the anti-class. In the model of Lenin, the spread of the mode of production and its social division was the root of the process of division. To analyze Jamestovo’s statistics, Lenin claims that, at that time, ancient Russian farming society was breaking down very quickly, and as a result of the process of division, new kinds of dwellers emerged. Among them, the rural bourgeois and the proletariat class were notable. In Lenin’s thesis on capitalism in Russia, he thought of the capitalists who exploited the general poor farmers. And in this way, the process of dividing farmers was very quick and widespread because of the spread of the capitalist system.



Fig: Lenin’s two-line model of the spread of capitalism in agriculture

(Source: John Harrison, Page 149)

 

Marxist View: Lenin: 

From the Marxist view, Lenin said that there was a great inequality of wealth distribution among the farmers. As a result, a great stratification occurred among farmers frequently. He also predicted that in the competitive market, economic advantages and disadvantages will increase gradually. And once the stage is set, the farmer will emerge. Some are given below.

  1. Competition.
  2. Struggle for the economically self-sufficiency.
  3. Increase the control of land by purchasing or renting.
  4. A few people hold most of the production.
  5. Turning the majority of people into the proletariat class.
  6. Few people exploited the proletariat class with their business capital.
  7. Farming labor was appointed by the contract of rent.

Understanding Peasants: Definition, Key Features, and Characteristics

According to Lenin’s theory of peasantry, “ In a natural pre-capitalist economy, farming units were composed of.”

  • Patriarchal peasant family.
  • Primitive village community.
  • Feudal Manor.

The major economic objectives of these units are to fulfill family consumption. These units were undifferentiated, and the social division of labor was absent.



Stratification of Peasant: 

Rural Bourgeois: 

  •  The financial base is very strong.
  • They sales produced agricultural products to buy land. 
  • 20% of the total peasants were rich farmers. They occupied 60-70% land.
  • They were owner of modern instruments of agriculture; in fact, they were LORDS in rural areas.

 Rural Proletariat:

  • They cultivated a small portion of land.
  • Most of them had no land.
  • Day labor, unskilled labor, and farm workers were included in this class.
  • They were half of the total population.

Middle Class:

  • 30% of the total population was in this class.
  • They were absolutely unstable, and their economic status was very low.
  • The above two classes were created from the middle class.

The Application of Lenin’s Theory in Bangladesh:


Most of the people live in rural areas in Bangladesh. They are engaged especially with cultivation. The classification of farmers in Lenin’s theory, we have already found it in rural peasant society. Normally, here we also find some farmer classes such as:

  • Rich farmer;
  • Middle farmer;
  • Lower farmer;
  • Marginal farmer;

Here, rich farmers, like rural bourgeois, according to Lenin, exploit other farmers regularly. Having huge land property, modern instruments, the rural bourgeoisie dominate the lower and marginal farmers, especially, and gain more economic establishment through their large production.

Criticism of Lenin’s Theory

  1. Lenin only classified the farmer class. But he did not give any theory for the betterment of the farmer.
  2. Lenin studied only the Russian farmer, but he did not classify the farmers of other countries.
  3. Lenin has no specific theory.
  4. He did not give any theory. He only criticized others sociologist’s theory.
  5. He has no specific explanation for the middle-class farmer.
  6. Without the village Bourgeoisie and the village proletariat, other classes arise, but he has no opinion about this class.
  7. He did not get the time to present his theory. He just got his theory in the time of debating.